The news on the networks is that this is the 1st down week in some time for the SPX. All told the SPX gave away a touch over 1% and was down over 2% at certain points. Yet the VIX has barely rallied and the June VIX futures haven't moved. Take a look at this graph from VIXcentral.com:
Most of the news is out from Big Ben and hte skinny is the Fed could taper bond purchases. The market is taking it fairly well as the the SPX is down about 1% today after being up almost 1% in the morning. I take it that where the Fed has to intervene less would be a good thing but the market has had so many up days that this would be enough reason for a pause. Things still look to be just ok which is much better than before in the bad old Euro crisis days. Remember SPX 1350? Just look at last year around this time.
When traders see a wide spread between the VIX and Front month futures they often get confused or even worried. When in fact the opposite is usually true. Last month with 8 days to go to VIX expiration the VIX closed at 13.19, the April VIX future closed 13.60. A mere .50 premium to the cash. The VIX future ended up settling at 15.64. The month before that the VIX closed 11.56 (it’s lowest since 2006) the March VIX futures closed 12.95 on their way to a settle near 12.50. Today the curve looks as such:
As the SPX continues its rally though 1630 and toward 1650, may a novice is asking why the VIX isn’t touching all-time lows. The answer is simple: volatility
When the VIX got to its recent low realized volatility was in the toilet. We had been through about 2 straight months of nothingness. 10 Day HV was near 5 and both 20 and 30 day HV were near 10%. Looking at HV now we can see a clear difference. 10 day HV is closer to 10% and 20 and 30 day are actually trading at a premium to VIX.
The last two weeks have been interesting for VIX and VIX futures watchers, for several reasons. In relation to the VIX, the realized volatility has been above implied for about 2 weeks and appears that it might stay there for a while.
I wrote the first installment of this series over two years ago, promising to explain the practical ramifications of the the basics that I’d covered using the tools of the trade. After enough procrastinating, I’ve finally gotten around to doing the second installment.
One of the most followed stocks on the NASDAQ, FB, had earnings last night. There was HUGE volume yesterday ahead of earnings and May3 weekly volatility got to 150% ATM. FB actually made a decent move by the end of the day today, moving up to near 29.00 a share. But, those who bought upside calls are probably NOT happy. Take a look at a shot of the FB May3 29 calls from yesterday.
IN the last few days, since Bank of America took a dive on its earnings, the stock has found some real strength. BAC is now just a few cents from its 52 week high and threatening a 2 year high. The move has not been a slow grinding move like we see sometimes out of banks. It’s been a nice quick move.
This is why I am so confused by where BAC IV is trading. Take a look at this stock chart, IV graph (the red line) and 20 day HV chart (the blue line).
We were closing a position in the SL today and it was a ratio put spread turned into a very cheap (.04) butterfly and my feeling was BBRY is not quite done. Earnings are coming out in the July cycle and some trades that have been working very well lately are the modified earnings plays. What do I mean by that? Well the idea is to own gamma and pay very little in theta for duration of the trade. It is what Mark Longo calls on the Option Block “juice for free”.